From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20569 invoked by alias); 5 Oct 2004 18:01:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20538 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2004 18:01:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 5 Oct 2004 18:01:06 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1CEtcY-0008W8-52; Tue, 05 Oct 2004 14:01:06 -0400 Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 18:01:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Jim Blandy Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa/dwarf] Support for attributes pointing to a different CU Message-ID: <20041005180105.GA18203@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jim Blandy , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20040923045723.GA11871@nevyn.them.org> <20040924003412.GB10500@nevyn.them.org> <20041003161221.GA3234@nevyn.them.org> <20041004212201.GA21064@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00088.txt.bz2 On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 11:11:35AM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote: > > Regarding the type hash: > > I've been looking over the code again this morning, and I don't see > that it really makes much of a difference in clarity to make the type > hash per-objfile instead of per-CU. So I think that last patch you > posted is ready to go in. Checked in after final testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu. To do: - NEWS entry - Testsuite - Hopefully some internals documentation - Investigate removing die->type in favor of the hash table Thanks! -- Daniel Jacobowitz