From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-36122-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 25779 invoked by alias); 4 Oct 2004 18:23:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 25749 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2004 18:23:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO walton.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 4 Oct 2004 18:23:56 -0000
Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl [192.168.0.2])
	by walton.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i94INsVX027623;
	Mon, 4 Oct 2004 20:23:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.12.6p3/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i94INsMa001359;
	Mon, 4 Oct 2004 20:23:54 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from kettenis@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost)
	by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.12.6p3/8.12.6/Submit) id i94INsMM001356;
	Mon, 4 Oct 2004 20:23:54 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 18:23:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200410041823.i94INsMM001356@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: cagney@gnu.org
CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <41618D95.2050003@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Mon, 04
	Oct 2004 13:51:17 -0400)
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Build inf-ptrace.o when ptrace available
References: <415DC09D.2070407@gnu.org> <200410012154.i91Ls6lE001359@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <41615D1E.8070007@gnu.org> <200410041720.i94HKl66001187@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <41618D95.2050003@gnu.org>
X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00061.txt.bz2

   Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 13:51:17 -0400
   From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>

   >    Going forward we need to get GNU/Linux and other systems using procfs 
   >    and an obvious migration path for that is to build support for both 
   >    procfs and ptrace into a single GDB.  The default being to use ptrace.
   > 
   > The /proc on Linux is not even close to a "real" procfs.

   Fortunatly, that can be fixed (just like any other kernel bug - we've 
   been seeing success in that area recently ;-).

You know Andrew, you can be really funny ;-).

Mark