From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7865 invoked by alias); 4 Oct 2004 14:34:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7856 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2004 14:34:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 4 Oct 2004 14:34:44 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1CETvH-0001lO-R1; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 10:34:43 -0400 Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 14:34:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Build inf-ptrace.o when ptrace available Message-ID: <20041004143443.GB6653@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <415DC09D.2070407@gnu.org> <20041003145013.GA14842@nevyn.them.org> <41615EA5.8050803@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41615EA5.8050803@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00047.txt.bz2 On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 10:31:01AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 04:39:57PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > > >>>Hello, > >>> > >>>This modifies GDB's configure to build inf-ptrace.o whenever the ptrace > >>>call is available. Thoughts? > > > > > >I think this only makes sense as part of the removal of NATDEPFILES, > >and that it doesn't make sense without the context of how you plan to > >remove the other members of NATDEPFILES. Since we're still going to > >need a way to specify the native configuration files, why bother? > > See Mark's e-mail (and it is easier than remembering which NATDEPFILES > need it). I think that's a non-issue. You don't need to remember it - either it's there or it isn't. -- Daniel Jacobowitz