From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7535 invoked by alias); 3 Oct 2004 14:50:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7527 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2004 14:50:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 3 Oct 2004 14:50:15 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1CE7gk-0003sR-LG; Sun, 03 Oct 2004 10:50:14 -0400 Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2004 14:50:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Build inf-ptrace.o when ptrace available Message-ID: <20041003145013.GA14842@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <415DC09D.2070407@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <415DC09D.2070407@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00035.txt.bz2 On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 04:39:57PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Hello, > > This modifies GDB's configure to build inf-ptrace.o whenever the ptrace > call is available. Thoughts? I think this only makes sense as part of the removal of NATDEPFILES, and that it doesn't make sense without the context of how you plan to remove the other members of NATDEPFILES. Since we're still going to need a way to specify the native configuration files, why bother? -- Daniel Jacobowitz