From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12349 invoked by alias); 28 Sep 2004 20:41:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12314 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2004 20:41:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO priv-edtnes57.telusplanet.net) (199.185.220.220) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 28 Sep 2004 20:41:28 -0000 Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr ([154.20.71.80]) by priv-edtnes57.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP id <20040928204125.YARG16476.priv-edtnes57.telusplanet.net@takamaka.act-europe.fr>; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:41:25 -0600 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 4F75947D98; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:41:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:41:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Paul Hilfinger , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA]: Turn on initial Ada support in GDB Message-ID: <20040928204125.GB1285@gnat.com> References: <20040927103327.450A8F2C33@nile.gnat.com> <01c4a597$Blat.v2.2.2$990c9580@zahav.net.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01c4a597$Blat.v2.2.2$990c9580@zahav.net.il> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00462.txt.bz2 > > +Dispatching subprogram calls are not implemented. > > "Dispatching" is not plural, so we should say ``is not implemented''. Actually, it is the "Dispatching subprogram calls" that are not implemented. Maybe we should rephrase it to "Calls to dispatching subprograms"? (dispatching subprograms is a concept that we use in Ada to provide OO programming). -- Joel