From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
Michael Chastain <mec.gnu@mindspring.com>,
me@cgf.cx, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Suggested ways to remove the need for xm-go32.h
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 02:29:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040927022853.GA2105@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4154372C.7080100@gnu.org>
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 11:03:08AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >For the previous question of testing, I don't think it's a worthwhile
> >requirement; however, it's a very important requirement for build time.
> >I build with --build != --host routinely. So do a lot of Cygwin folks,
> >I think.
>
> You'll need to be more specific. Which build, which host. Presumably
> these are all modern hosts and support "rb".
My point was not for "rb" in particular - you're quite right - but just
correcting Joel's statement about the existance of --build/--host
users. If we had some need to autoconf for this and just default it to
"rb", that would be in practice OK (though autoconf tests with
cross-build defaults are EVIL INCARNATE).
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-27 2:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-18 13:21 Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-19 11:44 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-09-20 3:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-22 20:21 ` Michael Chastain
2004-09-23 4:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-23 6:02 ` Michael Chastain
2004-09-23 8:14 ` Corinna Vinschen
2004-09-23 5:03 ` Christopher Faylor
2004-09-23 6:30 ` Michael Chastain
2004-09-23 8:02 ` Corinna Vinschen
2004-09-24 10:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-24 14:35 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-09-23 13:56 ` Christopher Faylor
2004-09-23 17:20 ` Michael Chastain
2004-09-23 17:24 ` Christopher Faylor
2004-09-23 15:18 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-09-23 17:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-09-24 15:05 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-09-25 16:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-26 18:38 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-09-27 2:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2004-09-23 20:58 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-09-23 21:14 ` Christopher Faylor
2004-09-24 10:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-24 12:23 ` Corinna Vinschen
2004-09-24 13:39 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-09-24 19:51 ` Christopher Faylor
2004-09-24 21:16 ` Christopher Faylor
2004-09-24 21:32 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-09-24 13:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-24 16:49 ` Ian Lance Taylor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040927022853.GA2105@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=brobecker@gnat.com \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=me@cgf.cx \
--cc=mec.gnu@mindspring.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox