From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2972 invoked by alias); 24 Sep 2004 14:35:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2959 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2004 14:35:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 24 Sep 2004 14:35:28 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 8092347D95; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 07:35:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 14:35:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/PATCH/mips16] Remove dead code in mips_insn16_frame_cache Message-ID: <20040924143525.GP968@gnat.com> References: <20040923233443.GJ968@gnat.com> <41542C42.1060500@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41542C42.1060500@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00401.txt.bz2 > >2004-09-23 Joel Brobecker > > > > * mips-tdep.c (mips_insn16_frame_cache): Remove dead code or > > conditions that will always be true. > > Definitly! Thanks! I will commit this change later today. May I have permission to mimic the mips32 changes into mips16 without asking for approval? Or would you rather see the patch first? (I'm asking because it saves me a tiny bit of time. But not much so it's not a big deal if I have to send an RFA first). -- Joel