Re: [PATCH/RFA] Don't apply line-number tweaks for non-GCC compilers

[Mark Kettenis <kettenis@sibelius.xs4all.nl>]

   From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
   Date: 20 Sep 2004 16:44:33 -0500

[ That earned you a nice bounce I suppose.  I've moved, and therefore
  got rid of my cable.  On the bright side, I've now got a decent ISP
  and a fixed IP address. ]

   Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl> writes:
   > The line-number tweaks we do for the sake of GCC 2.95.3 mess up the
   > line number info for non-GCC compilers that emit stabs.  In particular
   > this makes it annoying to debug code using the Sun compilers on SPARC.
   > This patch attempts to fix that.  Please refer to the comment in the
   > code for details.
   > 
   > I deliberately did not remove the while line-number hack.  In the end
   > that's what we should really do, but I still do most of my GDB work on
   > systems that have GCC 2.95.3 as their default compiler, and I really
   > like being able to run the testsuite on those platforms.
   > 
   > OK?

   (Thanks for finding this, Andrew.)

   Is there any reason you're not testing processing_gcc_compilation,
   instead of checking the last N_FUN's desc?

Other than that it's a global variable?  No not really.  I suppose it
was because the patch actually is a slimmed down version of a patch
that tried (and failed) to distinguish between a broken GCC and a
fixed GCC too.

Do you prefer checking processing_gcc_compilation?  I suppose it's
better because it makes the intent clearer.

Mark