From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18570 invoked by alias); 11 Sep 2004 03:50:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18561 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2004 03:50:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 11 Sep 2004 03:50:25 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1C5yu7-0000x5-9W; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 23:50:23 -0400 Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 03:50:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Hilfinger@CS.Berkeley.EDU Cc: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] patch to remove language-dependent numeric output support Message-ID: <20040911035023.GA3631@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Hilfinger@CS.Berkeley.EDU, Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <41425E6F.4050607@gnu.org> <200409110240.i8B2eXel018837@tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200409110240.i8B2eXel018837@tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00179.txt.bz2 On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 07:40:32PM -0700, Paul Hilfinger wrote: > > > Just some notes though: > > > (local_decimal_format_custom): Remove. > > > > > > * utils.c: (int_string): New function. > > I suspect that the the blank lines aren't needed - blank lines separate > > commits rather than separate parts of the same commit - whichever. > > Really? OK. Actually, I was putting in blank lines just to break up > a long ChangeLog entry, but if there's actually a convention, I'm > happy to follow it. FWIW, I've always used blank lines to separate logically distinct portions of a changelog entry. I have no idea what the actual convention is :-) -- Daniel Jacobowitz