Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: your turn :-)
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 23:30:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040904233049.GX1216@gnat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040904190742.GW1216@gnat.com>

> I'll see if I can take care of this. Right now, GDB is completely
> broken again. This change sort of patch things up a little bit
> by preventing a SEGV. But we get some other problems that just
> screw the testsuite run.

The first problem that I saw was the following. Using advance.exp:

        (gdb) b func
        Breakpoint 1 at 0x10001600: file advance.c, line 18.
        (gdb) run
        Starting program: /chico.a/brobecke/mips-inline/gdb-public/gdb/testsuite/gdb.bas
        e/advance 
        
        Breakpoint 1, func () at advance.c:18
        18        x = x + 5;
        (gdb) advance func3
        warning: GDB can't find the start of the function at 0x3.
        
            GDB is unable to find the start of the function at 0x3
        and thus can't determine the size of that function's stack frame.
        This means that GDB may be unable to access that stack frame, or
        the frames below it.
            This problem is most likely caused by an invalid program counter or
        stack pointer.
            However, if you think GDB should simply search farther back
        from 0x3 for code which looks like the beginning of a
        function, you can increase the range of the search using the `set
        heuristic-fence-post' command.
        zsh: 19433825 segmentation fault (core dumped)  ../../gdb advance

It turns out it was that heuristic_proc_desc problem I sent a patch for
striking again. Forgot to apply my patch before starting the testsuite
:-(.

-- 
Joel


  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-04 23:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-04  0:12 Andrew Cagney
2004-09-04 19:07 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-09-04 23:30   ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2004-09-04 23:58   ` Andrew Cagney
2004-09-05  0:14     ` Joel Brobecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040904233049.GX1216@gnat.com \
    --to=brobecker@gnat.com \
    --cc=cagney@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox