From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16163 invoked by alias); 3 Sep 2004 22:42:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16156 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2004 22:42:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 3 Sep 2004 22:42:17 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id A9EC547D92; Fri, 3 Sep 2004 15:42:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 22:42:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [commit] Inline one find_proc_desc call, simplify Message-ID: <20040903224216.GO1216@gnat.com> References: <4138F0B4.30601@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4138F0B4.30601@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00070.txt.bz2 > Just FYI (hope I got this one right), There is a little oopsie in the ChangeLog: > > * mips-tdep.c (find_proc_desc): Inline call to find_proc_desc. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ after_prologue > Simplify as NEXT_FRAME is NULL. > (find_proc_desc): Simplify as NEXT_FRAME is non-NULL. I'll give the testsuite another spin. See what we get out of it. -- Joel