From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA/RFC] fix problems with unwinder on mips-irix
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 23:09:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040902230928.GF1216@gnat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41338063.7020500@gnu.org>
Andrew,
FYI: This is something I have started investigating but can't finish
just yet because I have to move off to something else. You said:
> This kernel_trap stuff isn't applicable here.
>
> > kernel_trap = PROC_REG_MASK (proc_desc) & 1;
> > gen_mask = kernel_trap ? 0xFFFFFFFF : PROC_REG_MASK (proc_desc);
> > float_mask = kernel_trap ? 0xFFFFFFFF : PROC_FREG_MASK (proc_desc);
But in fact for a reason I don't completely understand just yet, we
do have kernel_trap set occasionally (I measured ~300+ times in our
testsuite). For instance, in all-bin.exp, debugging all-types:
(gdb) break main
(gdb) run
Starting program: /[...]/all-types
Breakpoint 1, main () at all-types.c:35
35 dummy();
(gdb) next
!! -> *** DEBUG: kernel_trap in mips_insn32_frame_cache ***
36 return 0;
I don't have all the details just yet, but my semi-educated guess
is that the sequence of events that lead to this is the following:
. User enters next command
. GDB does a next, and waits for events
. We land inside dummy (unverified)
. Put a temporary breakpoint at return address, continue (unverified)
. Land at return address
. and somehow find ourselves unwinding past main inside __start.
(and no, I don't think this qualifies as a kernel trap - but if
I remove this code, I get lots of new failures)
I'll look at this and all your other suggestion a bit later, when
I have some time again.
--
Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-02 23:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-23 1:11 Joel Brobecker
2004-07-30 0:22 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-03 4:44 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-08-04 1:43 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-06 18:31 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-08-06 19:13 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-30 18:18 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-08-30 19:32 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-31 23:44 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-09-01 14:57 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-09-02 23:09 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2004-09-03 20:17 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040902230928.GF1216@gnat.com \
--to=brobecker@gnat.com \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox