From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30207 invoked by alias); 26 Aug 2004 16:17:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29957 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2004 16:16:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.142) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 26 Aug 2004 16:16:59 -0000 Received: by us.ibm.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 877D611B69; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 09:14:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Paul Gilliam Reply-To: pgilliam@us.ibm.com To: Michael Chastain Subject: Re: Avoid timeouts in call-sc.exp Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 16:17:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200408181426.30208.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> <200408251206.41425.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> <412DF0E9.nail3XH41WLNH@mindspring.com> In-Reply-To: <412DF0E9.nail3XH41WLNH@mindspring.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200408260914.50276.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00709.txt.bz2 On Thursday 26 August 2004 07:17, Michael Chastain wrote: > > Here is another try. > > All right! You got everything but the "synchronize" with an "h". > s/syncronize/synchronize/g, both the ChangeLog entry and the > call-sc.exp code. > > In the ChangeLog entry, it should read: "gdb.base/call-sc.exp", > not just "gdb.base/call-sc". > > With those changes, this patch is approved, and you can check it in. > > Do you have write access to the gdb cvs repository, > or would you like me to check it in for you? Not to be a pain, but I am a CVS virgin. Could you check it in inside of a 'script' and send me (or post) the transcript? > > > PS: I only did the ${....} because that seemed to be the usage in > > call-sc.exp. > > Yes. So I'm trying to get new code written the simple way but there's > that huge body of old code. Isn't that Newton's first law of software momentem? (or was it Knuth?) > > === > > 2004-08-25 Paul Gilliam > > * gdb.base/call-sc: Make sure PC is syncronized after the "return".