From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29515 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2004 13:21:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29496 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2004 13:21:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 19 Aug 2004 13:21:37 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1BxmrI-0005Ai-Hc; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 09:21:36 -0400 Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 13:21:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Chastain Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, eliz@gnu.org Subject: Re: [rfa/doco] Test Suite: build != host Message-ID: <20040819132135.GA19467@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Chastain , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, eliz@gnu.org References: <4124776A.nailCD81LG97@mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4124776A.nailCD81LG97@mindspring.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00586.txt.bz2 On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 05:48:26AM -0400, Michael Chastain wrote: > This patch documents that the gdb test suite is supported with > build != host, but that some test scripts do not work and > will return UNRESOLVED if build != host. > > I don't know if "UNRESOLVED" needs some kind of @foo{...} > markup. > > Testing: rebuilt gdb doco, it looked okay. > > Okay to commit? I'd just like to say... one of the few examples you had in favor of build != host testing was crosstool. Whoever gave you that example was mistaken; crosstest.sh only supports host != target, so people are probably -not- testing gcc with build != host. I still think this requirement is a bad idea, but it's your call. -- Daniel Jacobowitz