Re: [RFA]: Java Inferior Call Take 2

Andrew Haley
2004-08-02T15:17:43Z

Andrew Haley writes:
> Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
> > On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 03:49:30PM -0400, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> > > Ping.
> >
> > I was waiting for Andrew to try fixing up gcj so that we could avoid
> > the method name problem. Andrew, are you going to have time to do
> > that, or should we pursue the hack for now after all? I'd much rather
> > it be fixed.
>
> Sorry Daniel, I've been away. You are right: it should be fixed in
> gcc. I will do this as soon as I get stuff sorted out.

Okay, I've made a patch but I'm not sure it's what you want.

This is a snippet from a typical file:

.long 0x9ca | .long 0x851
.byte 0x1 .byte 0x1
.string "java.lang.Class.forName(java.lang.String)" | .string "forName"
.byte 0x3 .byte 0x3

Is that what you want? I've only made the change for method names;
field names are as before.

Andrew.