From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27642 invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2004 15:12:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27631 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2004 15:12:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 12 Aug 2004 15:12:41 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id D0D0147D91; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 08:12:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 15:12:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: What should we do with rs6000? Message-ID: <20040812151240.GW25562@gnat.com> References: <20040811221554.GG25562@gnat.com> <411AA437.1060702@gnu.org> <20040812033326.GP25562@gnat.com> <411B5D77.1080906@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <411B5D77.1080906@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00461.txt.bz2 > >Do I understand correctly that you're saying that we should remove > >xm-rs6000.h as well? > > Yep. The infrastructure is going. Hmm, sorry, my fault. Can I ask again, just to make sure I am not misinterpreting you: This is a configuration I can not test - we should be able to remove blindly these xm­ files without breaking anything, but since I can't test them, it may break. Should we go ahead now anyway? -- Joel