From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2969 invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2004 07:22:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2925 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2004 07:22:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO server7.nfra.nl) (192.87.1.57) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 12 Aug 2004 07:22:03 -0000 Received: from juw15.nfra.nl [10.87.8.15] by server7.nfra.nl; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:22:07 +0200 Received: from juw15.nfra.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by juw15.nfra.nl (8.12.2+Sun/8.11.1) with ESMTP id i7C7KvCu021794; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:20:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by juw15.nfra.nl (8.12.2+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) id i7C7KvJE021791; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:20:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 07:22:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200408120720.i7C7KvJE021791@juw15.nfra.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: brobecker@gnat.com CC: Peter.Schauer@regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de, kevinb@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20040812045900.GS25562@gnat.com> (message from Joel Brobecker on Wed, 11 Aug 2004 21:59:00 -0700) Subject: Re: [RFC] Merge aix.mh and aix432.mh ? References: <20040812045900.GS25562@gnat.com> X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00441.txt.bz2 Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 21:59:00 -0700 From: Joel Brobecker aix.mh and aix432.mh (in config/powerpc) are identical, with the exception of a comment that applies to all versions of AIX. Should we only keep aix.mh with the extra comment? Yes please! If you don't hear from Kevin or Peter soom, I'd say, just go for it. Please also simplify configure.host accordingly. Mark