From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12654 invoked by alias); 9 Aug 2004 13:18:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12643 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2004 13:18:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 9 Aug 2004 13:18:53 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1BuA3A-0007Ga-Oz for ; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 09:18:52 -0400 Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 13:18:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [testsuite] Kfail signals.exp failures Message-ID: <20040809131852.GD27539@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20040808231810.GA24826@nevyn.them.org> <4117210E.nailSD2F36F9@mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4117210E.nailSD2F36F9@mindspring.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00305.txt.bz2 On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 03:00:30AM -0400, Michael Chastain wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > Andrew removed some "suspicious" xfails in signals.exp when he > > overhauled it. They're a legitimate bug in GDB; I've put a complete > > analysis in PR 1738. I expect all hardware single step targets to > > fail; I maintained the previous list from the removed setup_xfails > > (and added x86_64). > > Neat. This patch is approved. Checked in. We may need to refine the target list later... This covers most of the FAILs on my i686-pc-linux-gnu system. The remaining are corefile.exp (blocked on vsyscall support); null_record.exp (something has broken in GDB's debug info, maybe?); and watchthread.exp (there's a bug in the test script, but I can't test the patch, because it also triggers some internal bugs in GDB). -- Daniel Jacobowitz