From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6422 invoked by alias); 9 Aug 2004 13:11:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6414 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2004 13:11:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 9 Aug 2004 13:11:06 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bu9vd-0007Ba-NM; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 09:11:05 -0400 Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 13:11:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, mec.gnu@mindspring.com Subject: Re: [testsuite] Kfail signals.exp failures Message-ID: <20040809131105.GA27539@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, mec.gnu@mindspring.com References: <20040808231810.GA24826@nevyn.them.org> <200408090745.i797jnFc000594@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200408090745.i797jnFc000594@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00302.txt.bz2 On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 09:45:49AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2004 19:18:10 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > 2004-08-08 Daniel Jacobowitz > > PR gdb/1738 > * gdb.base/signals.exp (signal_tests_1): KFAIL bug in continuing > from a breakpoint with a pending signal. > > Hmm, SPARC doesn't have hardware single-step. Solaris SPARC has > single-stepping implemented in the kernel, but all other OS'es don't > have that. I wonder if this test passes anywhere? Thinking about it again, the software singlestep breakpoint is inserted when !breakpoints_inserted, so the same problem should apply. -- Daniel Jacobowitz