From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9246 invoked by alias); 9 Aug 2004 18:27:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9239 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2004 18:27:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 9 Aug 2004 18:27:32 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i79IRWe1019428 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 14:27:32 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i79IRVa20532 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 14:27:31 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn50-22.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.22]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i79IRVgU004518 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 14:27:31 -0400 Received: from saguaro (saguaro.lan [192.168.64.2]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.11/8.12.10) with SMTP id i79IRQXx003992 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 11:27:26 -0700 Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 18:27:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC/AIX] xm-aix4.h - Remove HAVE_TERMIOS #define Message-Id: <20040809112725.2c29de0c@saguaro> In-Reply-To: <20040808042718.GB24160@gnat.com> References: <20040808042718.GB24160@gnat.com> Organization: Red Hat Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00325.txt.bz2 On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 21:27:18 -0700 Joel Brobecker wrote: > config/xm-aix4.h contains the following definitions: > > | /* At least as of AIX 3.2, we have termios. */ > | #define HAVE_TERMIOS 1 > | /* #define HAVE_TERMIO 1 */ > > I think we should be able to delete this one. It's already handled > by the configury. I checked in config.h, it's defined. > > I'll give it a try when I have moment. Yeah, this sounds reasonable to me. Kevin