From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5079 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2004 22:07:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5064 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2004 22:06:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO walton.kettenis.dyndns.org) (213.93.77.109) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 8 Aug 2004 22:06:59 -0000 Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org [192.168.0.2]) by walton.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p3/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i78M6Noa004330; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 00:06:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org) Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p3/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i78M6NKv049554; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 00:06:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p3/8.12.6/Submit) id i78M6M3u049551; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 00:06:22 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 22:07:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200408082206.i78M6M3u049551@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> From: Mark Kettenis To: drow@false.org CC: guitton@act-europe.fr, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, mec.gnu@mindspring.com In-reply-to: <20040808213614.GA20400@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Sun, 8 Aug 2004 17:36:15 -0400) Subject: Re: [RFA] x86 - jump instruction after the prologue References: <20040419173249.GA22201@act-europe.fr> <20040427163725.GA7319@act-europe.fr> <200404291624.i3TGO7PP003462@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <20040510202721.GB15632@nevyn.them.org> <20040512113101.GA1996@act-europe.fr> <20040808213614.GA20400@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00277.txt.bz2 Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2004 17:36:15 -0400 From: Daniel Jacobowitz On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 01:31:01PM +0200, Jerome Guitton wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz (drow@false.org): > > > Also, should we write i386-prologue.c in assembly to avoid this > > problem? That's what Fred did for SH to avoid a similar difficulty. > > Can't we compile this file without debug info? Yes indeed, and that fixes it. [snip] In the mean time, this is a test of a prologue analyzer. Compiling it without debug information seems reasonable to me. Tested on i686-pc-linux-gnu, OK? Tested on i386-unknown-freebsd4.7 (which uses stabs). Works fine, so yes OK. Thanks for looking into this. Mark