From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15549 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2004 12:33:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15540 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2004 12:33:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO walton.kettenis.dyndns.org) (213.93.77.109) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 8 Aug 2004 12:33:07 -0000 Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org [192.168.0.2]) by walton.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p3/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i78CWwoa003341; Sun, 8 Aug 2004 14:32:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org) Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p3/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i78CWwSP015066; Sun, 8 Aug 2004 14:32:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p3/8.12.6/Submit) id i78CWwfh015063; Sun, 8 Aug 2004 14:32:58 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 12:33:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200408081232.i78CWwfh015063@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> From: Mark Kettenis To: brobecker@gnat.com CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, cagney@redhat.com, Peter.dot.Schauer.at.regent.dot.e-technik.dot.tu-muenchen.dot.de@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org, kevinb.at.redhat.dot.com@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org In-reply-to: <20040808044649.GC24160@gnat.com> (message from Joel Brobecker on Sat, 7 Aug 2004 21:46:49 -0700) Subject: Re: [RFC/AIX] xm-aix4.h - Remove USG #define References: <20040808044649.GC24160@gnat.com> X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00246.txt.bz2 Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 21:46:49 -0700 From: Joel Brobecker config/xm-aix4.h has the following definition: | #define USG 1 The most obvious way of getting rid of it is to add a piece in configure.in to set this define if on AIX by adding a -D to the cflags, but that would be ugly. I think the best approach would be to see if we couldn't just get rid of its usage entirely. Need to review its usage first... The USG define just really has to go. Given the fact that GDB compiles without problems on many SystemV-ish systems without the define, my guess is that it can be eliminated. Just try what happens if you delete it on the oldest AIX system you can find. Mark