From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29742 invoked by alias); 7 Aug 2004 18:09:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29688 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2004 18:09:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 7 Aug 2004 18:09:28 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id D83D347D91; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 11:09:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 18:09:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/mips] Fix crash trying to print long double float Message-ID: <20040807180927.GA1192@gnat.com> References: <20040806181603.GQ1203@gnat.com> <20040806203243.GV1192@gnat.com> <411518CB.5060104@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <411518CB.5060104@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00209.txt.bz2 > >2004-08-06 Joel Brobecker > > > > * mips-tdep.c (mips_gdbarch_init): Set size of long double > > to 128 bits for N32 and N64 ABIs. > > > >Tested on mips-irix. OK to apply? > > Can you also clone / tweak the relevant floatformat (I'm wondering if it > should just go in doublest.[hc] and we should stop using floatformat.[ch]). Yes. I am planning on doing this tonight. But could this done separately from this patch, or do you think it doesn't make sense? My other question is: Do we need to take care of the big endian convention only, or do we need to look at the LE case as well (I don't have a clue as to what is happening in that case :-(, if this ever makes any sense). Thanks, -- Joel