From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20838 invoked by alias); 7 Aug 2004 05:13:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20830 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2004 05:13:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 7 Aug 2004 05:13:43 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1BtJWY-00046w-KW; Sat, 07 Aug 2004 01:13:42 -0400 Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 05:13:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Chastain Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, eliz@gnu.org Subject: Re: [rfa/doco] PROBLEMS: remove pr gdb/1505 Message-ID: <20040807051342.GA15773@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Chastain , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, eliz@gnu.org References: <41145FDE.nail9GZ1WMY09@mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41145FDE.nail9GZ1WMY09@mindspring.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00194.txt.bz2 On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 12:51:42AM -0400, Michael Chastain wrote: > One of the PR's in PROBLEMS has been fixed in gdb HEAD. > This patch removes the PR from PROBLEMS. > > I'm not sure what to put in the title. > Leaving it as "Known problems in GDB 6.2" is wrong. > So I changed it "Known problems in GDB HEAD". > > Testing: not tested. > > Okay to commit? I'm curious - why do you believe that PR 1505 has been fixed? Some particular instance may have been, but the problem definitely remains - see discussion on gdb@ this week. -- Daniel Jacobowitz