Re: [PATCH] Convert utils/sparclite to autoconf 2.59

Andrew Cagney
2004-08-05T19:49:53Z

> Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com> wrote:
> nn> Is utils/wince still used?
>
> Dunno.
>
> nn> How about utils/spu?
>
> Dunno.
>
> nn> How about utils/misc/doschk (which is in particularly bad shape)?
>
> utils/misc/doschk/doschk.c is identical to doschk.c from the
> doschk-1.1 package, which is available from:
>
> ftp.gnu.org/pub/non-gnu/doschk/doschk-1.1.tar.gz
>
> I just build the standalone package and use that. Works great for me.
> So I don't see any reason to keep doschk in utils. Eli? Andrew?

Yep.

Andrew