Re: [PATCH] Convert utils/sparclite to autoconf 2.59

Michael Chastain
2004-08-04T04:18:52Z

neroden@twcny.rr.com (Nathanael Nerode) wrote:
> This seems to be a moderately inactive directory. Please tell me if it should
> be blown away instead. Or if there are desired behavior changes which
> affect this patch.

According to gdb/NEWS, support for sparclite was removed in gdb 6.1.

Is utils/ shared with any other project?

gcc still supports sparclite, but when I check out gcc I don't get
utils/. Same with binutils; binutils supports sparclite, but binutils
doesn't include utils/.

I'm hoping utils/ is not actually shared and utils/sparclite can be
garbage collected.

There is one gdb PR on utils/sparclite/Makefile and utils/wince/Makefile:

http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/920
release tarball has generated files utils/sparclite/Makefile, utils/wince/Makefile

Michael C