From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13383 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2004 17:35:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13374 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2004 17:35:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 5 Aug 2004 17:35:51 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bsm86-0002Mi-Tp; Thu, 05 Aug 2004 13:34:15 -0400 Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 17:35:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Nathanael Nerode Cc: mec@gnu.mindspring.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Convert utils/sparclite to autoconf 2.59 Message-ID: <20040805173414.GA9011@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Nathanael Nerode , mec@gnu.mindspring.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <41126FA4.2020302@twcny.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41126FA4.2020302@twcny.rr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00125.txt.bz2 On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 01:34:28PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > >According to gdb/NEWS, support for sparclite was removed in gdb 6.1. > > > >Is utils/ shared with any other project? > > According to CVSROOT/modules, utils is strictly GDB. > Accordingly, I will proceed to blow away the utils/sparclite files and > related code. :-) > > Is utils/wince still used? I don't know. > How about utils/spu? I don't know about "used", but it's still useful. > How about utils/misc/doschk (which is in particularly bad shape)? I'm pretty sure it is still used. -- Daniel Jacobowitz