From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28936 invoked by alias); 27 Jul 2004 23:02:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28928 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2004 23:02:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2004 23:02:06 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1BpawI-00088k-1B; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:00:54 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:02:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Jeff Johnston Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA]: threaded watchpoint test Message-ID: <20040727230053.GA31203@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jeff Johnston , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <4106A553.7010202@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4106A553.7010202@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg00405.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 02:56:19PM -0400, Jeff Johnston wrote: > +# Watch values that will be modified by distinct threads. > +gdb_test "watch args\[0\]" "Hardware watchpoint 2: args\\\[0\\\]" > +gdb_test "watch args\[1\]" "Hardware watchpoint 3: args\\\[1\\\]" What about platforms without hardware watchpoints? This test will generate a lot of FAILs in that case. Not to mention targets with only one hardware watchpoint; I'm not sure if there are any. -- Daniel Jacobowitz