From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30155 invoked by alias); 21 Jul 2004 00:09:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30147 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2004 00:09:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 21 Jul 2004 00:09:18 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bn4em-0002ej-0w; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 20:08:24 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 00:09:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: David Lecomber Cc: patches Subject: Re: Dwarf2 Producer info Message-ID: <20040721000823.GA10146@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: David Lecomber , patches References: <1090362598.21483.108.camel@cpc4-oxfd5-5-0-cust12.oxfd.cable.ntl.com> <20040720231756.GA8250@nevyn.them.org> <1090367767.21483.120.camel@cpc4-oxfd5-5-0-cust12.oxfd.cable.ntl.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1090367767.21483.120.camel@cpc4-oxfd5-5-0-cust12.oxfd.cable.ntl.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg00274.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 12:56:07AM +0100, David Lecomber wrote: > > > Is set_cu_producer going to do anything else? Otherwise I don't see > > the point of the wrapper function. > > Hi Dan, > > Not in the immediately foreseeable future, but I can imagine a situation > where the producer is matched with some known producer strings and an > enumerated constant is stored instead; if that ever happens, it will be > better if there's one setter. There will still be only one setter; let's drop the useless wrapper, unless one of the dwarf2 maintainers feels otherwise. -- Daniel Jacobowitz