From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24941 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2004 20:50:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24927 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2004 20:50:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mclean.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.57) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 20 Jul 2004 20:50:46 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by mclean.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1Bn1ZT-0003Jd-00; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 16:50:43 -0400 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id 9555B4B104; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 16:50:58 -0400 (EDT) To: dberlin@dberlin.org, mec.gnu@mindspring.com Subject: Re: [commit/6.2] Fix lib (C)s; Was: src/gdb/testsuite ChangeLog lib/insight-suppor ... Cc: cagney@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Message-Id: <20040720205058.9555B4B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 20:50:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg00263.txt.bz2 db> A phone book is very long, but not able to be protected at all db> (Much to their chagrin :P). db> The text quoted has to meet a set of requirements for originality, etc, db> in order to be able to be protected. db> I don't believe it does. Okay, I see it would be hard to defend the FSF contact information and the license terms as protectible. But I'm concerned that the testsuite in particular has been very lax in applying copyright notices, and I don't want people to think "oh, it's just test code, it doesn't need a copyright notice". Michael C