From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12997 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2004 05:18:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12957 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2004 05:18:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hall.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.60) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 20 Jul 2004 05:18:28 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by hall.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1Bmn1H-0006Zl-00; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 01:18:27 -0400 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id 8D7B74B104; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 01:18:42 -0400 (EDT) To: cagney@gnu.org, dberlin@dberlin.org Subject: Re: [commit/6.2] Fix lib (C)s; Was: src/gdb/testsuite ChangeLog lib/insight-suppor ... Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, mec.gnu@mindspring.com Message-Id: <20040720051842.8D7B74B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 05:18:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg00249.txt.bz2 > So if you consider the license part of the protected work, and thus, > changing just the license text to be creating a new derivative work, > then you need to update the copyright date. > If you don't, you don't need to update the copyright date. Yeah, I believe that too. But I think the text quoted (in the URL Andrew cited) is long enough to make it worthwhile. Michael C