From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27442 invoked by alias); 19 Jul 2004 22:33:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27425 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2004 22:33:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO tisch.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.157) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 19 Jul 2004 22:33:16 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by tisch.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1Bmgh5-0004le-00; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 18:33:11 -0400 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id 0E8684B104; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 18:33:24 -0400 (EDT) To: cagney@gnu.org, mec.gnu@mindspring.com Subject: Re: [commit/6.2] Fix lib (C)s; Was: src/gdb/testsuite ChangeLog lib/insight-suppor ... Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, hunt@redhat.com Message-Id: <20040719223324.0E8684B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 22:33:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg00243.txt.bz2 > Given that the boilerplate "work" is stolen from COPYING and that has a > (C) of 1989,1991 why should you not instead be adding those dates (and > have those dates through out all of GDB's files)? If I had infinite time, I would. Michael C