From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22135 invoked by alias); 17 Jul 2004 14:25:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22121 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2004 14:25:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2004 14:25:22 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1Blq7A-0007bz-0p; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 10:24:36 -0400 Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 14:25:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [obish/6.2] GNU/Linux usage Message-ID: <20040717142435.GA28962@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <40F934DE.30803@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40F934DE.30803@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg00223.txt.bz2 On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 10:17:02AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > - Linux Standards Base says that programs that use 'long > + Linux[sic] Standards Base says that programs that use 'long > double' on PPC GNU/Linux are non-conformant. */ > set_gdbarch_long_double_bit (gdbarch, 8 * TARGET_CHAR_BIT); Er, is that really necessary? It's a workgroup named "Linux Standards Base" and even has the trademark for "LSB". I'd be annoyed if a [sic] appeared in the middle of my company name, for sure. -- Daniel Jacobowitz