From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17553 invoked by alias); 14 Jul 2004 17:47:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17525 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2004 17:47:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO granger.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.148) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 14 Jul 2004 17:47:40 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by granger.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1Bknr1-0001lR-00; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:47:39 -0400 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id 9559D4B104; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:47:41 -0400 (EDT) To: cagney@gnu.org, mec.gnu@mindspring.com Subject: Re: [commit] cleanup annota*.exp ``cleanup core file'' messages Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Message-Id: <20040714174741.9559D4B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:47:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg00165.txt.bz2 ac> Perhaphs I could be listed as an explicit ``commit''. That would make me happy. Right now the MAINTAINERS file has two things bundled together. If somebody is listed, they have commit rights, and they have the responsibility to review other people's patches. I wouldn't unbundling this a little. How about: testsuite Michael Chastain mec.gnu@mindspring.com Andrew Cagney cagney@gnu.org (authorized to commit, but not responsible to review) ac> PS: This flurry of activity was prompted by the need to get consistent ac> test names out of the testsuite - the tests I cleaned up were all ac> producing system dependant messages. Yeah, test names have these unwritten requirements on them, because there are 10,000 test names and people need to run automated processing scripts on the results. Michael C