From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12924 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2004 15:30:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12917 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2004 15:30:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 30 Jun 2004 15:30:26 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bfh2L-0004pV-AO; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:30:13 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 15:30:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa] New test sigbpt.{c,exp} Message-ID: <20040630153012.GA18499@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , Michael Elizabeth Chastain , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20040630035317.5BEF84B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> <40E2DB52.5060702@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40E2DB52.5060702@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00693.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 11:25:06AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Are there [get_kernel_info] and [get_software_singlestep] testsuite calls? I don't even know a reliable way to find out if we're using software singlestep from the GDB prompt, besides trying to grok the multiarch dump (and I'm not sure that would work). Perhaps we should add one. Is [get_kernel_info] a good idea? Version numbers don't tell you much; everyone seems to port fixes every which way. -- Daniel Jacobowitz