From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11982 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2004 22:37:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11941 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2004 22:37:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO blount.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.226) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 29 Jun 2004 22:37:22 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by blount.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1BfRE8-0004mT-00; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:37:20 -0400 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id 9BB394B104; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:37:20 -0400 (EDT) To: bob@brasko.net, eliz@gnu.org Subject: Re: -file-list-exec-source-files Cc: ezannoni@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, jimb@redhat.com Message-Id: <20040629223720.9BB394B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:37:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00683.txt.bz2 Eli, it looks like you think that Bob's patch falls within your area of authority. To me, it looks like a generic symtab patch and that is the domain of Jim and Elena. I don't think you have the authority to approve this patch. Although maybe I'm missing something here? (I like Bob's patch, too, and I recommend that Jim or Elena approve it, based on my test results with it). And I hate being the guy to make a fuss over this. Also poor Bob doesn't deserve this hassle either. Michael C