Re: [RFA] infcmd.c: Fix UI problem in attach_command

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>]

On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 07:58:57PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:14:18 +0200
> > From: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com>
> > > 
> > > Do you (or anyone else, like Elena) know why do we relinquish the
> > > terminal to the inferior while loading the symbol table?  It sounds
> > > like a strange thing to do at this point.
> > 
> > I don't know and it sounds strange to me as well.  I've tested a simlified
> > patch which just moves the call to target_terminal_inferior right before
> > the normal_stop call.  It works as good as my original patch, but I'm not
> > sure if there's a specific situation which requires an early switch to
> > the inferior.
> 
> I tend to suggest that we commit this simplified patch and see if
> anybody screams.

This seems reasonable to me; if the patch tested OK on one platform
with job control I don't think there are major terminal-handling
gotchas it might trigger.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz