From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9082 invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2004 16:18:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9075 invoked from network); 26 Jun 2004 16:18:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hall.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.60) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 26 Jun 2004 16:18:32 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by hall.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1BeFsu-0003F9-00 for gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 12:18:32 -0400 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id 82A9B4B104; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 12:18:35 -0400 (EDT) To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] testsuite/gdb.base/attach.exp: Add missing kill -9 Message-Id: <20040626161835.82A9B4B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 16:18:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00567.txt.bz2 [Oops, I sent this to gdb-patches@redhat.com instead of gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com] cv> I'll add it with my next patch (which probably comes today anyway). Okay. mec> Also, how did you test this patch? cv> Erm... that's a funny question. I tested the testcase by running it. If you could just say "I ran it on Cygwin" (or whatever you ran it on), that would be fine. When some patch breaks, I find it's helpful to know what platform it actually did work on back when it was submitted. Michael C