From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4143 invoked by alias); 21 Jun 2004 02:44:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4130 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2004 02:44:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO granger.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.148) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 21 Jun 2004 02:44:09 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by granger.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1BcEn1-0000aY-00; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 22:44:07 -0400 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id 6A4F64B104; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 22:44:17 -0400 (EDT) To: jingham@apple.com Subject: Re: RFA: patch to fix gdb/1680 Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Message-Id: <20040621024417.6A4F64B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 02:44:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00471.txt.bz2 > Note, this duplication of the regexp engine is what I wrote about a > couple of weeks ago when removing expect first came up... I found your message again after I posted mine ... now I feel dumb. "Three months in the lab can often save thirty minutes in the library." We're in pretty good shape with gdb because I've been using stock TCL 8.4.6 + Expect 5.41 for a long time, years now. So I've already swept the minefield, as it were. > Finally, note that if you need to see the result regexp as it ACTUALLY > gets to dejagnu, pass the --debug flag in RUNTESTFLAGS, and it will > spit out a file named dbg.log in build/gdb/testsuite which shows among > much other stuff the actual regexp that dejagnu is trying to match. Wow, I didn't know about that. That will help me in the future. Michael C