From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24592 invoked by alias); 17 Jun 2004 05:24:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24581 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2004 05:24:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 17 Jun 2004 05:24:52 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18EE6F2C0C; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 01:24:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 14096-01-4; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 01:24:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nile.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1345) id C85DBF2D16; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 01:24:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Paul Hilfinger To: eliz@gnu.org Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, drow@false.org, jimb@redhat.com In-reply-to: <3405-Wed16Jun2004210332+0300-eliz@gnu.org> Subject: Re: [RFA]: Turn on Ada support, take 2 References: <20040608090758.C59CAF2940@nile.gnat.com> <20040609131240.GA7587@nevyn.them.org> <20040616084237.F02D1F292A@nile.gnat.com> <3405-Wed16Jun2004210332+0300-eliz@gnu.org> Message-Id: <20040617052451.C85DBF2D16@nile.gnat.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 05:24:00 -0000 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at nile.gnat.com X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00404.txt.bz2 > > [...] I will have to consider the > > issue of formating things like 'Address, since the standard rendering > > in info files provided by the technically appropriate marker, > > @code, looks rather bad (in my opinion), due to the adjacent quotes > > at the beginning. > > If you feel strongly about this, I won't object to use of @t{'Address} > in those cases where you think the standard markup looks bad. Eli, Well, I feel strongly that the result of @code{'Address} looks really cruddy in an .info file. However, it occurs to me that if I rewrote the section a little to supply dummy prefixes (e.g., @code{Obj'Address}), the result would not be so bad and would use the right markup command. > I have a couple more comments about the patch to gdb.texinfo; sorry > if I missed those in the first reading. > > > +@node Ada Mode Intro > > +@subsubsection Introduction > > +@cindex Ada mode, general > > There's no need to add the "general" qualifier here, since you have > no other index entry that begins with "Ada mode". So simply say > "@cindex Ada mode". > > > +While in Ada mode, you may use `@t{--}' for comments. > > Is there a reason for using a @t here? Why not @samp{--}? OK on both. Paul Hilfinger