From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22190 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2004 02:00:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21782 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2004 02:00:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO casa.cgf.cx) (66.30.22.40) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 15 Jun 2004 02:00:43 -0000 Received: by casa.cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id 90B3238E12; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 22:01:55 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 02:00:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: section _raw_size and _cooked_size Message-ID: <20040615020155.GA30252@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20040614012415.GE28716@bubble.modra.org> <40CE2EE6.6030803@gnu.org> <20040615014018.GE6207@bubble.modra.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040615014018.GE6207@bubble.modra.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00344.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 11:10:18AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote: >On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 07:04:06PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: >> ok for gdb/sim (the changes are mindlessly mechanical). > >They're in. Apologies to anyone who checked out the tree between >2004/06/15 01:04Z and 2004/06/15 01:25Z, as it no doubt was broken >due to being only partially committed. > >The winsup/utils/ changes aren't in yet. Who gives the OK there? >cgf? http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2004-06/msg00210.html Yep. Go ahead. You have carte blanche to make bfd related changes in winsup/utils, as far as I'm concerned. I appreciate that you took this into consideration very much, btw. cgf