From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-33753-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 18202 invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2004 21:47:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 18189 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2004 21:47:35 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO walton.kettenis.dyndns.org) (213.93.77.109)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 10 Jun 2004 21:47:35 -0000
Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org [192.168.0.2])
	by walton.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p3/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i5ALlWLO000474;
	Thu, 10 Jun 2004 23:47:32 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org)
Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p3/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i5ALlWqA000579;
	Thu, 10 Jun 2004 23:47:32 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost)
	by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p3/8.12.6/Submit) id i5ALlWUm000576;
	Thu, 10 Jun 2004 23:47:32 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 21:47:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200406102147.i5ALlWUm000576@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org>
From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl>
To: cagney@gnu.org
CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <40C8CD62.5080902@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Thu, 10
	Jun 2004 17:06:42 -0400)
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Eliminate register_value_being_returned and legacy_return_value
References:  <40C8CD62.5080902@gnu.org>
X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00245.txt.bz2

   Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 17:06:42 -0400
   From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>

   Hello,

   This patch eliminates calls to both register_value_being_returned and 
   legacy_return_value by inlining / simplifying the callers.  Turns out 
   there was much duplication of effort with both the caller and callees 
   all performing the same tasks.

This patch gives me a bad feeling.  I had intentionally introduced
legacy_return_value to isolate all the legacy code in a single
function.  Yes, that duplicates some of the code, but I think it makes
the code much, much easier to understand.  It also makes removing the
legacy code much more easier later on.

Mark