From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26677 invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2004 02:50:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26661 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2004 02:50:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailhub.air.net.au) (203.52.201.202) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 10 Jun 2004 02:50:01 -0000 Received: from mailhub.air.net.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.air.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF29D36D92 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 12:49:58 +1000 (EST) Received: by mailhub.air.net.au (tmda-sendmail, from uid 500); Thu, 10 Jun 2004 12:49:57 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 02:50:00 -0000 To: DJ Delorie Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: top-level removal of dejagnu, expect Message-ID: <20040610124954.A10766@mailhub.air.net.au> References: <20040610092223.A1221@mailhub.air.net.au> <200406092340.i59Ne3FT028298@greed.delorie.com> <20040610101446.B3128@mailhub.air.net.au> <200406100214.i5A2Ew3P031152@greed.delorie.com> <20040610121927.A9164@mailhub.air.net.au> <200406100229.i5A2Tvv9031322@greed.delorie.com> <20040610123403.A10027@mailhub.air.net.au> <200406100241.i5A2fUML031527@greed.delorie.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <200406100241.i5A2fUML031527@greed.delorie.com>; from dj@redhat.com on Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 10:41:30PM -0400 From: Ben Elliston X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/0.86 (Venetian Way) X-Primary-Address: bje@air.net.au X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00215.txt.bz2 --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-length: 322 > A minor argument against the change is that it's not needed yet, I'd > think for such a major change we'd want to do the least change > needed until the change has proven itself. It seems to me that the > toplevel stuff is cleanup, not prep. OK, fair enough. However, the src-release patch is probably required. Ben --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline Content-length: 189 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAx8xSbNtDbHIEhSURAn27AJ9co7rhgl16j4VdVfMaKoKnnXCOhQCfWT66 izZsX64ivPNmBJSxzcS1jKI= =0u1T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK--