> > I'm not sure why you think moving to one copy of the FSF dejagnu
> > sources will disturb that.
> 
> I was concerned about the toplevel build support, not the dejagnu
> sources.  The toplevel makefile/configure can deal with dejagnu being
> there or not, I see no need to remove such support.

The obvious reason to remove such support is to reduce the amount of
stuff to maintain.  If having top-level build support for expect and
dejagnu is important to Red Hat, can't Red Hat maintain local patches?

Ben