From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10100 invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2004 09:50:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10079 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2004 09:50:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 10 Jun 2004 09:50:45 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B9ACF2829; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 05:50:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 21694-01; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 05:50:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nile.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1345) id 269D8F2C06; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 05:50:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Paul Hilfinger To: drow@false.org Cc: jimb@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20040609131240.GA7587@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Wed, 9 Jun 2004 09:12:40 -0400) Subject: Re: [RFA]: Turn on Ada support References: <20040608090758.C59CAF2940@nile.gnat.com> <20040609131240.GA7587@nevyn.them.org> Message-Id: <20040610095044.269D8F2C06@nile.gnat.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 09:50:00 -0000 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at nile.gnat.com X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00221.txt.bz2 > I'm not sure if those parts will work without the Makefile.in changes, > and I'm not in favor of the Makefile.in changes yet. > > The problem is that the Ada language support has never been reviewed. > It's in the repository as a code dump under the assumption that it will > be reviewed before we start actively using it. So in my opinion, to > review this patch we first have to review those files. Well, we merge and test against the CVS head frequently, so we're sure it "works", but I certainly agree that review is necessary. For those eager to start (:->) I suggest waiting for a day or so, until my next check-in of Ada sources. I will save (or rather, postpone) some of the reviewers' work by marking (with distinctive conditionalization) some substantial sections that we have not turned on yet in the public version, so that they may be skipped for the time being. Paul Hilfinger