From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14561 invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2004 02:31:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14490 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2004 02:31:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 10 Jun 2004 02:31:06 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5A2V6i5030514; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 22:31:06 -0400 Received: from post-office.corp.redhat.com (post-office.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.227]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i5A2V6009272; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 22:31:06 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (dj.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.0.222]) by post-office.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i5A2V3D18141; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 22:31:03 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by greed.delorie.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5A2V0HH031381; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 22:31:00 -0400 Received: (from dj@localhost) by greed.delorie.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5A2V0pI031377; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 22:31:00 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 02:31:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200406100231.i5A2V0pI031377@greed.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: bje+dated+1087093602.c12795@air.net.au CC: binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20040610122639.A9508@mailhub.air.net.au> (message from Ben Elliston on Thu, 10 Jun 2004 12:26:39 +1000) Subject: Re: top-level removal of dejagnu, expect References: <20040610092223.A1221@mailhub.air.net.au> <200406092340.i59Ne3FT028298@greed.delorie.com> <20040610101446.B3128@mailhub.air.net.au> <200406100214.i5A2Ew3P031152@greed.delorie.com> <20040610122639.A9508@mailhub.air.net.au> X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00212.txt.bz2 > And I'll ask you: are you happy with this change from the point of > view of libiberty? Yes. Libiberty doesn't care which dejagnu it uses.