From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11574 invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2004 02:30:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11405 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2004 02:30:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 10 Jun 2004 02:30:06 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5A2U6i5030199; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 22:30:06 -0400 Received: from post-office.corp.redhat.com (post-office.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.227]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i5A2U6008473; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 22:30:06 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (dj.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.0.222]) by post-office.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i5A2U1D17889; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 22:30:02 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by greed.delorie.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5A2Twa9031326; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 22:29:58 -0400 Received: (from dj@localhost) by greed.delorie.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5A2Tvv9031322; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 22:29:57 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 02:30:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200406100229.i5A2Tvv9031322@greed.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: bje+dated+1087093170.a4c71f@air.net.au CC: binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20040610121927.A9164@mailhub.air.net.au> (message from Ben Elliston on Thu, 10 Jun 2004 12:19:27 +1000) Subject: Re: top-level removal of dejagnu, expect References: <20040610092223.A1221@mailhub.air.net.au> <200406092340.i59Ne3FT028298@greed.delorie.com> <20040610101446.B3128@mailhub.air.net.au> <200406100214.i5A2Ew3P031152@greed.delorie.com> <20040610121927.A9164@mailhub.air.net.au> X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00211.txt.bz2 > > I don't doubt you will, but I was referring to porting, not fixing. > > Red Hat has a lot of internal ports that we support through our > > in-tree dejagnu that are still under NDA. > > I'm not sure why you think moving to one copy of the FSF dejagnu > sources will disturb that. I was concerned about the toplevel build support, not the dejagnu sources. The toplevel makefile/configure can deal with dejagnu being there or not, I see no need to remove such support.