From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23634 invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2004 00:32:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23617 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2004 00:32:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cgf.cx) (66.30.22.40) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 10 Jun 2004 00:32:50 -0000 Received: by cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id 4DD84400780; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 20:32:50 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 00:32:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [Patch ping] Re: COFF & mixed debug formats Message-ID: <20040610003250.GA13254@coe.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20040416141603.GA6965@coe.bosbc.com> <20040609152517.GA15223@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00205.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 04:23:33PM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote: >Daniel Jacobowitz writes: >> At this point it seems apparent that Philippe De Muyter is not going to >> respond. By analogy with the other symbol readers I believe this patch >> is obviously correct and can be committed; does anyone disagree? > >Nope. I've said I thought it looked good a long while ago. So, go for it Brian! cgf