From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16886 invoked by alias); 9 Jun 2004 15:25:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16792 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2004 15:25:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 9 Jun 2004 15:25:25 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1BY4x4-00045L-EX; Wed, 09 Jun 2004 11:25:18 -0400 Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 15:25:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Brian Ford Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [Patch ping] Re: COFF & mixed debug formats Message-ID: <20040609152517.GA15223@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Brian Ford , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20040416141603.GA6965@coe.bosbc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00177.txt.bz2 At this point it seems apparent that Philippe De Muyter is not going to respond. By analogy with the other symbol readers I believe this patch is obviously correct and can be committed; does anyone disagree? On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 10:18:11AM -0500, Brian Ford wrote: > Ping. > > On Mon, 17 May 2004, Brian Ford wrote: > > > Ping. > > > > On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Brian Ford wrote: > > > > > If I'm being too persistent, just tell me to go sit quietly on my hands > > > for a while ;-). This patch is almost a month old now, though. > > > > > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-03/msg00548.html > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Brian Ford wrote: > > > > > > > Well, it's been another week. Anybody want to step in here? > > > > > > > > It's a pretty simple patch; just a cut and paste from elfread.c. > > > > > > > > On Fri, 16 Apr 2004, Brian Ford wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 16 Apr 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > > >> Who can approve the COFF stuff? > > > > >> > > > > >> On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 03:12:42PM -0500, Brian Ford wrote: > > > > >>> BTW, who am I waiting on to approve the coffread.c portion of this > > > > >>> patch: > > > > >>> > > > > >>> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-04/msg00183.html > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Is it Philippe De Muyter? A quick search of the archives shows the > > > > >>> last message from him to be in June 2002. > > > > > > > > > > At Jim Blandy's suggestion, I pinged him personally on Wednesday. Let's > > > > > give him a week or so to respond. > > -- > Brian Ford > Senior Realtime Software Engineer > VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems > FlightSafety International > the best safety device in any aircraft is a well-trained pilot... > -- Daniel Jacobowitz