Re: [patch/rfc] mark structs2.exp tests as kfail on hppa

[Randolph Chung <randolph@tausq.org>]

> "KFAIL" means known failure inside gdb.
> "XFAIL" means expected failure in something outside gdb (like gcc).
> 
> So these would be XFAIL's.  setup_xfail has a three-argument form
> so you can say "setup_xfail hppa-*-* gcc/15860".

thanks.

updated patch follows, if we want to put this in..

randolph


2004-06-07  Randolph Chung  <tausq@debian.org>

	* gdb.base/structs2.exp: Mark two tests as xfail because of a compiler
	problem.

Index: gdb.base/structs2.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/structs2.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.2 structs2.exp
--- gdb.base/structs2.exp	6 Mar 2001 08:21:51 -0000	1.2
+++ gdb.base/structs2.exp	7 Jun 2004 19:10:47 -0000
@@ -29,6 +29,12 @@ set testfile "structs2"
 set srcfile ${testfile}.c
 set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
 
+# Create and source the file that provides information about the compiler
+# used to compile the test case.
+if [get_compiler_info ${binfile}] {
+    return -1;
+}
+
 # build the first test case
 if  { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable {debug}] != "" } {
     # built the second test case since we can't use prototypes
@@ -64,10 +70,16 @@ gdb_test "break param_reg" \
     "Breakpoint .* at .*" \
     "structs2 breakpoint set"
 
+if { [ test_compiler_info gcc-*-* ] } then {
+  setup_xfail hppa*-* gcc/15860
+}
 gdb_test "continue" \
     ".*pr_char=120.*pr_uchar=130.*pr_short=32000.*pr_ushort=33000.*bkpt = 1.*" \
     "structs2 continue1"
 
+if { [ test_compiler_info gcc-*-* ] } then {
+  setup_xfail hppa*-* gcc/15860
+}
 gdb_test "continue" \
     ".*pr_char=-126.*pr_uchar=120.*pr_short=-32536.*pr_ushort=32000.*bkpt = 1.*" \
     "structs2 continue2"