Re: [PATCH]: Updates to Ada sources, part 1 (longish)

Andrew Cagney
2004-06-04T19:10:11Z

> On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 11:37:43AM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote:
>
>>>> > The ChangeLog entry should provide a summary of what was added/changed
>>>> > at this point in time - stuff like listing the new functions and summary
>>>> > of changed functions. Can we do that?
>>
>>>
>>> What I was saying was that it's going to be a non-trivial amount of time
>>> to prepare that monster changelog entry. If you (the maintainers) think
>>> it is necessary then, fine, we'll do it. But I'd much rather see this
>>> time used to other things as I don't think the benefits of this
>>> particular task will outweight the cost. But it's the maintainers call.
>
>
> Personally, I don't think it's worthwhile. These files are still not
> built in the FSF tree. Until they are, I think they have the moral
> equivalent of a changelog entry that says "New file". Once they are
> built, naturally, they'll be change controlled like anything else.
>
> Just my opinion.

So lets delete them.

Andrew